Search for: "B. D. G., Individually" Results 41 - 60 of 2,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2009, 5:33 am
Thus, the following dollar limits will apply for 2010, each of which is the same amount as for 2009: --the limit under Section 402(g)(1) on the exclusion for elective deferrals which are described in Section 402(g)(3), and which are made under 401(k) and other plans, will be $16,500; --the limit under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(i) for catch-up contributions to a plan, other than a SIMPLE 401(k) plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or a SIMPLE IRA described in Section 408(p),… [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm by oliver randl
The definitions of g’, HMW and LMW are disclosed at page 4, lines 5-20. [2.2] The specified values of features (b), (d) and (e) of present claim 1 are disclosed in originally filed claim 3. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:14 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
., of Feasterville, Pennsylvania filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, MBK Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Matey’s Restaurant & Bar, of Michigan City, Indiana, Bryan Konieczny, and Mark Kehoskie, both individuals residing in Indiana, infringed its rights in the “UFC 202: Diaz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 1:56 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Dell, Individually, & d/b/a Magic in the Sky of Boerne, Texas, filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Miand, Inc. of LaPorte, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration No. 5,184,437 for the mark MAGIC IN THE SKY (the “Mark”). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:40 am
(b) Each patient shall be treated as individual with dignity and respect and shall not be subjected to verbal or physical abuse of any kind. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 9:31 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Dans l’affaire du: Renvoi relatif à la Loi sur la non-discrimination génétique édictée par les articles 1 à 7 de la Loi visant à interdire et à prévenir la discrimination génétique, 2018 QCCA 2193Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Montréal, 500-09-026870-170Décision de : Juges Nicole Duval Hesler (juge en chef),… [read post]
This update discusses selected litigation, regulations / administrative guidance and pending legislation, on both the federal and state levels, in the following general areas of environmental law: (A) Water Rights and Supply, (B) Water Quality, (C) Wetlands, (D) Air Quality and Climate Change, (E) Endangered Species, (F) Renewable Energy, (G) Hazardous Substance Control and Cleanup, (H) National Environmental Protection Act, and (I) Mining / Oil & Gas, (J) Streambed… [read post]
This update discusses selected litigation, regulations / administrative guidance and pending legislation, on both the federal and state levels, in the following general areas of environmental law: (A) Water Rights and Supply, (B) Water Quality, (C) Wetlands, (D) Air Quality and Climate Change, (E) Endangered Species, (F) Renewable Energy, (G) Hazardous Substance Control and Cleanup, (H) National Environmental Protection Act, and (I) Mining / Oil & Gas, (J) Streambed… [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Enlarged Board must examine the above admissibility requirements with respect to each referred question individually (see, for example, G 3/08 and G 2/19). [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:39 am by Simon Lester
In order to determine whether the EU Seal Regime provides for "less favourable treatment", B should be compared with A (as the group of non-conforming imported products and the group of non-conforming like domestic products) and the treatment granted to E (or more precisely E, H and K) should be compared with D (D, G and H in the table provided by the European Union) (as the group of conforming imported products and the group of conforming like domestic … [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:47 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
(“Joe Hand”), of Feasterville, Pennsylvania, filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, MBK Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Matey’s Restaurant & Bar, of Michigan City, Indiana, Bryan Konieczny, and Mark Kehoskie, both individuals residing in Indiana, infringed its rights in the “UFC 202: Diaz v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Admissibility of the referral[1] In decision G 1/07 [4.2.3] the EBA pointed out that it was aware that, subsequent to decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 different opinions have been expressed in the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal on whether decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 relate to the disclaiming of embodiments which are disclosed as part of the invention in the application as filed or whether in that situation the jurisprudence as previously established… [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 5:20 am by Minick Law
If an individual sells, manufactures, delivers, transports, or possesses 400 grams or more, they are guilty of a Class D felony under N.C. [read post]
10 May 2015, 12:06 pm by Stefan Passantino
This prohibition extends beyond the activities of individual brokers and dealers. [read post]