Search for: "B. J. Floyd"
Results 41 - 60
of 138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
As Floyd LJ wondered in London Taxi: should one take into account or ignore the fact that consumers will recognise the shape? [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:24 am
Johnson – Alvo – Alvo Cemetery, NE Harvey B. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
On 7 and 8 March 2019 Warby J heard the first two days of data protection trial in the case of Rudd v Bridle. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:30 am
You can find this pattern in Mozart, Beethoven, Gershwin, Weber and Pink Floyd. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Capulong, Michael J. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
The bench consisted of Lord Justice Kitchin (now Lord Kitchin since his elevation last month to the Supreme Court), Lord Justice Floyd and Lady Justice Asplin. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
WHITE, J., presentó una opinión disidente, [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am
The unusual posture in which Floyd raised his Batson and J. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Floyd Abrams, New York City, for respondents. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 11:54 am
Rosenstein appointed former FBI Director Robert J. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Kitchin LJ was supported by Floyd LJ and Sir Geoffrey Vos, both of wh [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
The law on added matter was not disputed, having been recently reviewed by Floyd LJ (with Longmore LJ and Lewison LJ both in agreement) in AP Racing Ltd v Alcon Components Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 40 (reported on by this blog here). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Ute Kilger (Böhmert & Böhmert), Munich, and Miquel Montana (Clifford Chance) then reported on their respective countries’ perspectives on plausibility as a separate requirement. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:38 am
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
The answers in short are: (a) not really; and (b) not anymore. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:15 am
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
Analysing the five principles put forward by Floyd J in Ratiopharm v Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd [2008] EWHC 3070 (Pat) (see paras 154-159), Johnny observed that the days of simply pleading "obviousness over the CGK" are long gone - you must now assert what it is that you specifically allege is CGK. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Brian pointed out that categories (a) and (b) are generally considered acceptable whereas category (c) will generally amount to an abuse of process. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
Apotex argued that paragraph (b) of the definition of [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
