Search for: "B. Keller" Results 41 - 60 of 348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2021, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
" But "highly offensive to a reasonable person" is essentially encompassed in an obscenity determination, and we have already said that material regulated by Section 21.16(b) is non-obscene. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Canadian Constitution Foundation contended that this provision violated section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees freedom of expression since the provision prohibited dissemination of accidental and unknown falsehoods and applied to an overly broad category of people and topics. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:47 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
” 3) Article 17: (Mis)understanding the intent of the legislator by Paul Keller “Today, the French Government presents the second report on content recognition tools on digital sharing platforms commissioned by the Conseil Supérieur de la Propriété Littéraire et Artistique (High Council for literary and artistic property – CSPLA). [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 12:26 pm by José Guillermo
  Existen muchas citas bíblicas,  NINGUNA define “SER HUMANO”,   ¿Que es "SER HUMANO"? [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:12 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
He was arrested because he chose to exercise his rights.That element reminded me of the episode in Keller, TX with Dillon Puente and his father. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Top 3 Kluwer Copyright Blog posts of September/October/November 1) CJEU hearing in the Polish challenge to Article 17: Not even the supporters of the provision agree on how it should work by Paul Keller “On Tuesday, November 10, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or Court) heard case C-401/19. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
Top 3 Kluwer Copyright Blog posts of September/October/November 1) CJEU hearing in the Polish challenge to Article 17: Not even the supporters of the provision agree on how it should work by Paul Keller “On Tuesday, November 10, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or Court) heard case C-401/19. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Letter From Kevin Cieply (Ave Maria), Leticia Diaz (Barry), Deidré Keller (Florida A&M), Peter Goplerud (Florida Coastal), Erin O’Connor (Florida State), José R. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am by Eric Goldman
The bill was pitched as a narrow and modest bipartisan reform of Section 230; and Daphne Keller of Stanford labeled the bill an “intellectually serious effort” and a “huge step forward” compared to other alternatives. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 8:15 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
[…]» Rechtsanwältin Claudia Keller: «Rechtliche Risikoanalyse im Einzelfall» Anwaltskollegin Claudia Keller (Wenger Vieli) schreibt – gemeinsam mit drei Anwaltskollegen – unter anderem: «Das Urteil hat verständlicherweise bei dem für das Privacy Shield Abkommen [sic!] [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:53 pm by Allan Blutstein
Judge Orders DOJ to Explain Its Secret Portions of the Mueller Report by Next WeekBy Aaron Keller, Law & Crime, July 13, 3020A federal judge on Monday granted a Justice Department request to delay providing detailed answers to questions about former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s full, unredacted Russia report.The judge, Reggie B. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The Court held that the trial court erred by concluding that the defendant’s RJA MAR was procedurally barred, as the original version of the RJA included language, then codified in G.S. 15A-2012(b), allowing defendants to seek relief “[n]otwithstanding any other provision or time limitation” in the MAR article. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 3:37 am by INFORRM
In a previous post, I described the growing calls for what I called a “systemic duty of care” (“SDOC”) in platform regulation. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
§ 1125(a)(1)(B), as well as several state law claims. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Larry Cook
If the coronavirus were present in Oceana Grill itself, then the restaurant asserts that it would be owed coverage for business interruption.It cannot be overstated that the complaint alleges that the Lloyd’s policy does not contain a “virus” exclusion.On Wednesday, March 25, 2020, Thomas Keller Restaurant Group filed a declaratory judgment action against Hartford Fire Insurance Company, in the Superior Court of California, seeking coverage for business income losses on… [read post]