Search for: "B. Sandoval" Results 41 - 60 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm by Aaron Pelley
Mitchell’s SVP order under CR 60(b) that had denied him a full evidentiary hearing. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Funeral Services, Inc. d/b/a Magic Valley Memorial Gardens, we analyzed an identical arbitration provision. __ S.W.3d __ (Tex. 2011). [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:32 pm by Steve
" "I'd like to see A-rated, B-rated, C-rated political discourse," sayeth the General. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
., Lexis Employment Relationships—Excluded Employers—Court of Appeal, in split opinion, granted applicant’s petition for writ of review and affirmed WCAB’s finding that The Salvation Army, operating as private, nonprofit organization sponsoring applicant during his participation in residential treatment program mandated as condition of his court-ordered probation, was statutorily excluded from being applicant’s employer for workers’ compensation purposes under… [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:38 pm by Arfaa Law Group
Consequently, the court ruled the defendants’ arguments on appeal lacked merit and affirmed the district court’s judgment in favor of Sandoval. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:29 am by Bill Otis
Brian Sandoval of Nevada, now forever consigned to Trivia questions.The most noteworthy and depressing fact about Obama's selection is that it's a faux nomination. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 8:59 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
(Sandoval, Miguel), Lexis Statute of Limitations—Cumulative Injuries—WCAB, after granting reconsideration, held that applicant’s 12/21/2021 claim for cumulative injury to abdomen (hernia) and other body parts ending on 4/26/2019, due to repetitive lifting while working as landscaper/laborer, was not barred by one-year statute of limitations in Labor Code § 5405(a), when WCAB found that applicant’s date of injury under Labor Code § 5412 based on date… [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm by Hunter Biederman
I recently showcased an article, "Two Local Judges Investigated in Grand Jury Investigation"  by the Collin County Observer. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Accordingly, this Court holds that AC § 10-131(b) does not implicate the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:19 am by Jamie Spencer
His sole point of appeal: insufficiency of the evidence.From the evidence at trial, Ortega was – at best – a mule, the lowest level courier hired by a drug lord or kingpin to take the risk of transporting dope from place A to place B. [read post]