Search for: "BALL v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In Gill v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:33 am
In this second post of a series examining the self-made constitutional crisis engulfing the Episcopal Church (USA), the focus will be on the complications created by the ongoing existence and treatment of four pseudo-dioceses (San Joaquin, Fort Worth, Pittsburgh and Quincy; another may soon be forced into existence in South Carolina).These are all invited disasters; they need not have turned out as badly as they have. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Yesterday’s oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:06 am
Kellogs v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Keithly v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
See Doe v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:11 am
This was the case in Deslandes v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Perhaps Elton John v Guardian News & Media Ltd [2008] is a step towards a more open and free speech parody defence that exists in the USA. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:38 am
The ‘330 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Geomelt USA, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:13 pm
Forum Selection Clause Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Death penalty USA, 2001-2002 (2009) and Death penalty USA 2003 - 2004 (2008) and Death penalty USA 2005 - 2006 (2008). [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
Teva Pharms., USA, Inc., No. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:46 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Government’s Exhibit List USA v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:40 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that after last week’s oral argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:05 pm
Even with this low-ball estimate, Obama can see that hospitals kill more people than terrorists. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
