Search for: "BARNARD v. US " Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2011, 1:18 am by John Hochfelder
Agency (4th Dept. 2006) - $5,000,000 ($1,000,000 past - 4 years, $4,000,000 future - 41 years) for a 31 year old man with a burst fracture at T-12 and lumbar fractures who required four level spinal fusion surgery and was left with bladder and sexual dysfunction and severe debilitating back pain but could do light household work and use a treadmill for 25 minutes Curiously, the decision in Barnard v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:19 am
The general rule in such “free speech” cases was set out in Connick v Myers, 461 US 138. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:26 am by Anita Davies
The Telegraph has already suggested that David Cameron may use the speech as ammunition in the ongoing debate over the Strasbourg court’s decision in Hirst v UK (App No. 74025/01) on prisoners’ voting rights. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:57 pm by VMaryAbraham
v=AdvXCKFNqTY [Photo Credit: Crashcandy] [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:43 pm by INFORRM
Lord Devlin’s second category for exemplary damages in Rookes v Barnard – conduct calculated to make a profit which may well exceed the compensation payable – would be difficult to argue against here. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:04 pm by Mike Sykuta
Wright 24 Financial-market contracting, by Dean V. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
Six shipments of the pesticide, used in other herbicides to kill weeds, was delivered to Albaugh’s facility in St. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 11:45 am by Stephen Gillers
A district judge refused to dismiss the case (Jovanovic v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:21 pm
  That's hard for us public speculators to know, since we do not know all of the facts. [read post]