Search for: "BARNETT v. JONES"
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
Jones and Smith v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:36 am
But as even Crowell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Ed. 2d 876, 889 (1990); Jones v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
Jones, 255 N.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:40 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), (ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, David Spinoza Tanenhaus, ed., Gale, 2008).Amelia J. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
As I also indicated in the housing discussion, I don’t think TCRR adequately explains the willingness of the Supreme Court to decide Jones v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
As I also indicated in the housing discussion, I don’t think TCRR adequately explains the willingness of the Supreme Court to decide Jones v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
An article in the Washington Times focuses on Antoine Jones, the respondent in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:01 am
Barnette (1943). [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
Aug. 20, 2002); Jones v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937), United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937), United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:44 am
But despite the landmark Somerset v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Hall v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
First, Richard Epstein and Randy Barnett contend that Congress can only regulate the sale and transportation of goods across state lines, which furthers their libertarian vision.[19]Concededly, the core meaning of “commerce” has always been trade, but in 1787 its regulation also included market-oriented activities such as manufacturing, banking, and insurance.[20]The Constitution’s ratifiers shared that view, and early ICC legislation (approved by Presidents and the Court)… [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
“The fact that this decision was apparently political, rather than legal, completely undermines its legitimacy as a precedent,” vented Randy Barnett, counsel for the Republican state officials who brought the case. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation Inforrm had a blog post from Steven Barnett “Journalists must not allow themselves to be used by unscrupulous politicians”. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]