Search for: "BE v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 257,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Kavanaugh is quoting Justice Kennedy's concurrence in the judgment in Simon & Schuster v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
One way to get around spending 10 years in the US to overcome 212(a)(9)(B) inadmissibility is if the applicant is eligible for a waiver under INA §212(a)(b)(b)(v), which is based on a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative such as a spouse or parent is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
The AD1 suggested, however, that on remand the Civil Court could apportion the rent suspension to exclude such portion(s) of the premises that had been used for storage.They sure took that taking that seriously.# # #DECISIONMatter of 195BO LLC v A., Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Despite the Supreme Court ruling in Radovich v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
To date, the UN system has not developed sufficient structures or tools to further reinforce implementation support, including systematic data gathering, wide-ranging capacity-building, or a global “help desk” for businesses, States, civil society and other stakeholders. [read post]
The Ukrainian government is currently in process of investigating 120,000 potential Russian war crimes and currently has four inter-state cases pending against Russia before the ECHR. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
I was glad to see that the California Court of Appeal published its opinion in Luo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm by Eric Goldman
The court says Coursera’s process provided reasonable notice to the plaintiff: the language in the email is reasonably conspicuous because the header clearly states that the email included updates to the TOU, the TOU hyperlink is in blue font and stands out from the remaining text, and the hyperlink is followed by a description of the TOU which specifically calls out “[u]pdated arbitration language. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:18 am by Roberto Rodrigues Pinho (RNA Law)
  Furthermore, the PDP Project proposal must now include information on “intellectual property, exclusivity contracts or commercial agreements, including details of any agreements or restrictions on licensing or 3rd-party access to the technology” (Annex CX, article 8, V). [read post]