Search for: "BOARD OF TRUSTEES v BOARD OF COUNT"
Results 41 - 60
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Failing count and reckoning, for payment of £7.3 million. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 833, 851-852), the Court also acknowledged that “[t]he distinction between elements of a project and measures designed to mitigate impacts of the project may not always be clear” (quoting Lotus v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston Sys. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
CHRISTOPHER KROHA, Appellee. 5th District.Civil procedure -- Dismissal of complaint -- Action by condominium unit owner against another unit owner and condominium association alleging that improper installation of carpet on roof of condominium building resulted in water damage to plaintiff’s unit -- Appeals -- Order dismissing five of six counts against association is a non-final, non-appealable order where the remaining count arises out of the same facts as the dismissed… [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:53 am
Board of Trustees of Northern Illinois University, September 27, 2016, Hamilton, D.). [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:34 pm
The total rents from patents are larger than the total costs; similarly true for university patent licensing income v. costs overall, even w/a lot of losers. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm
Florida International University Board of Trustees v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:29 pm
He also filed an application that month for accidental disability retirement benefits with the Board of Trustees of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement System (PFRS). [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company,[3] the Maryland district court held that when a law firm reimburses a customer trust account for which one of the law firm’s partners was the trustee, such loss would be considered a loss under both the “Direct means Direct” and “Proximate Cause” opinions. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:15 pm
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York, v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:13 am
(See Black Acres Pure Trust v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Group health plans and insurance policies generally must count toward the out-of-pocket maximum limit all deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, or similar charges and any other expenditure the group health plan requires a covered person to pay for a qualified medical expense that is an “essential health benefit” within the meaning of ACA other than premiums, balance billing amounts for non-network providers and other out-of-network cost-sharing, or spending for non-essential… [read post]
