Search for: "BOOKS, INC. v. UNITED STATES"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 12:51 am
In the 1990s, the Church of Scientology’s generated a string of cases in the United States, colloquially known as “Scientology versus the Internet” (referring to: Religious Technology Center v Netcom (1995); Religious Technology Center v F.A.C.T.Net Inc (1995); Religious Technonlogy Center v Lerma (1995)).To understand the significance of these cases, we must go back to an earlier dispute between the Church of Scientology and a… [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
” Authors’ Guild v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:56 am
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:21 am
” Citing the merger clause in the employment agreement, United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:25 pm
Inc. and Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 4:42 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:52 am
In King v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 2:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds today’s State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 7:49 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:46 am
Eichensehr, Animal Science Products, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm
“This case,” Apple’s lawyers said, “presents issues of surpassing importance to the United States economy. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
The other case, United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:47 am
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:50 am
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:12 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., a case involving the applicability of U.S. copyright law to copies of works created and legally acquired abroad and subsequently imported into the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
United States, Kingsley Books v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:40 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Google’s motion to dismiss The Authors Guild, Inc., et al. v. [read post]