Search for: "BRISTOW v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm
Barnes and Noble Bathroom In March 2009, A.L. was in Barnes and Noble with Father and his parents when she received a text message from Father that stated: "Hi A.L. help daddy in Barnes and Noble toilet". [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm
Barnes and Noble Bathroom In March 2009, A.L. was in Barnes and Noble with Father and his parents when she received a text message from Father that stated: "Hi A.L. help daddy in Barnes and Noble toilet". [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm
Barnes and Noble Bathroom In March 2009, A.L. was in Barnes and Noble with Father and his parents when she received a text message from Father that stated: "Hi A.L. help daddy in Barnes and Noble toilet". [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Jeremy reports on the joint BLACA-IPKat event on sensory copyright [on which see earlier Katpost here].* "FAGE, Feta, Fontina": GIs come under scrutinyBusy week of IP events for Jeremy, who this time recounts another tasty seminar entitled "Geographical Indications: FAGE, Feta, Fontina, and the battle for world markets".* A test-drive for the Unified Patent Court: Part III Here Jeremy hosts the third in the series of posts from London-based law firm Bristows (where… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014]… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
In the light of this, the IPKat is delighted to host this guest post from Jeremy Blum, a partner in Bristows LLP and a fellow IP enthusiast to the core. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 am
Tom Double is an Associate in the Defamation and Reputation Management Team and the Cyber Investigation Unit at Collyer Bristow [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:47 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH has already attracted a lot of attention, not least because some good souls have rather forgotten that, while the Advocate General is a member of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and his rulings, always influential, are adopted by the CJEU in an estimated 75-80% of intellectual property cases, his Opinions are not actually the rulings of the court. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
Katfriends Morag MacDonald (Bird & Bird, left), Richard Vary (Nokia), Sally Field (Bristows) and the eponymous Mehmet Gün are there too, not to mention EPLAW Honorary President Pierre Véron, Margot Fröhlinger (all the way from Eponia), knowledgeable Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), the dashing Justin Turner QC and, well, you can see for yourself who else is there ... [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:24 am
The final speaker, Dominic Adair (Bristows, UK) brought the audience back to the present market conditions of low market penetration. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:51 am
In more general terms, does this decision imply a re-thinking of both earlier case law on computer programs and the idea/expression dichotomy, starting with the seminal decision in Baker v Selden? [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
, was a massive success thanks to the tireless efforts of fellow Kat Eleonora, who conceived and organised it, as well as our hosts, Bristows LLP, who provided full logistical support, refreshments and -- for the first time in an IPKat event -- streaming. [read post]
Case Law, Strasbourg: Ruusunen v Finland, The Private of Life of a Prime Minister – Dominic Crossley
20 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The right to privacy for a European head of state has hardly been more topical. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
The 2014 edition of Chambers & Partners states that "...he has a solid commercial appreciation of what's involved in a case". [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Bristows kindly hosted the event, which was jointly organised by the Intellectual Property Office, the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, and the IP Federation. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Life after L'Oréal is a topic that both Pail Jordan (Bristows) and Nicholas Saunders (Brick Court) will have a chance to reflect on. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:26 pm
Bently argued strongly it was not), by Article 17 of the Design Directive, Member States retain the right to regulate the breadth of protection afforded to designs by virtue of national copyright laws. [read post]
