Search for: "BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA" Results 41 - 60 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Commonwealth v Yastrop, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ruled that "substantial compliance with guidelines established in two earlier precedents of Pennsylvania's highest court is all that is necessary to minimize the intrusiveness of a roadblock seizure to a constitutionally acceptable level." [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 938 A.2d 417 (Pa. 2007) (3-2 decision with two concurrences in the result), was not even cited in Maya. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:30 am by Greg Ablavsky
John’s UniversityCOMMENT: Deborah Rosen, Lafayette College11:00-12:45: Slavery, Movement, and the Law: New Approaches to Gradual Abolition(hopefully close to the session above)PRESIDING: Daniel Hamilton, University of Illinois “Not very Fanatical on the Subject of Slavery:” Fugitive Slaves and the Persistence of Slavery in New Jersey, 1804-1846 James Gigantino, University of Arkansas The Conflict of Laws in the Crossing of Borders: Slavery and Antislavery… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
§ 8553, her recovery of damages against political subdivisions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is limited to $500,000, despite the $14 million dollar verdict a jury awarded her last week. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:46 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On April 8, in the case of Bingham v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Below the Supreme Court, Pennsylvania has two intermediate appellate courts, the Superior Court and the Commonwealth Court. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]