Search for: "Baker v Barnett" Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
"Lochnerians" is a reference to the much-maligned 1905 case of Lochner v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:59 am by David Bernstein
Carpenter, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:17 pm by Josh Wright
  First, the Commissioner complained that the Barnett administration did not evenhandedly invite relevant stakeholders to the Section 2 hearings; and now he complains that the Leibowitz FTC and Varney DOJ’s are guilty of the same offense. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney is liable in a malpractice action if the plaintiff can prove that the attorney failed to exercise the skill commonly exercised by an ordinary member of the legal community and that such negligence was the proximate cause of damages (see Rudolph v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corten & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; Barnett v Schwartz, 47 AD3d 197, 203; Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, LLC v Comprehensive Mental… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
Barnett today pens an item for the WSJ. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:37 pm
Barry Barnett Subscribing to our feed helps keep the free in economic freedom. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
Baker, Jr. - Louisiana State UniversityProf. [read post]