Search for: "Baker v. Lord"
Results 41 - 60
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a 3:2 majority, with Lord Hamblen and Lord Leggatt giving the leading judgment (with whom Lord Kerr agreed) and Lord Burrows and Lord Sales each giving dissenting judgments. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Athough the Strasbourg Courg had established that the concept of civil rights was autonomous, and not solely defined by signatory countries (Konig v Germany (No1) (A/27) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 ECHR), nevertheless Article 6 could only apply to civil rights that were arguably recognised under domestic law ( as established by the House of Lords in Matthews v Ministry of Defence (2003) UKHL 4, (2003) 1 AC 1163 applied). [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
But Sisyphean though it might be, Keyssar’s new book should enjoy the same status as his Pulitzer-finalist work, The Right to Vote (2000), which appeared just in time to appear as a visual prop over James Baker’s shoulder in his first Meet the Press appearance after the election. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
As Jerry Brown might observe, the Lord works in mysterious ways. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:31 am
Chester West and Chester Council v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:44 am
Fomento (Sterling Area) Ltd. v Selsdon Fountain Pen Co. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:54 am
Tom Hinchliffe was next to speak and did so on the recent case of Actavis v Merck which dealt with the question of whether the Court of Appeal could decide against its previous judgement in BMS v Baker Norton by which it should be bound. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
After an unsuccessful interim application in September 2019, Enka’s case came before Baker J in December 2019 in the High Court. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:19 am
” The ACLU is arguing that Bostic’s sentence violates Graham v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
One such decision was that in Mimo Connect v Buley & Ors, which ended up in the Court of Appeal a month ago with the decision of Lord Justice Bean (giving Judgment of the Court) handed down two weeks ago ([2023] EWCA Civ 909).BackgroundAs she said in the last post, trade secrets cases are full of facts, so buckle in. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Lord Neuberger restated the test as “significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable” ([53]). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
And Stewart Baker sat down with Andy Greenberg to discuss his book “Tracers in the Dark: The Global Hunt for the Crime Lords of Cryptocurrency. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:23 am
Baker. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:48 am
Much of this case was about whether the court of appeal could go against an earlier judgment of theirs (BMS v Baker Norton, to be exact), and in the end it decided it could, partly because the EPO case law in the area was 'settled' and happened to arrive at the opposite answer to what appeared to be the case in the UK. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
We had a case comment from Persephone Bridgman Baker. [read post]
