Search for: "Baker v. Wilson"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Buzzfeed News reports on Bauer Media’s appeal against the award of Aus$4.5 million made to actor Rebel Wilson which is being heard by the Court of Appeal in Victoria. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” In their second opinion yesterday, Wilson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has a post on both trials. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
In Brightside v RSM UK Audit [2017] 1 WLR 1943, Andrew Baker J held the view that CPR r6.14 fixes the date for all CPR purposes, including the date of service in Scotland. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
We had a case comment by Persephone Bridgman Baker Dhir v Saddler [2017] EWHC 3155 (QB) (Nicklin J). [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
The issue made it to the Supreme Court, where Chief Justice Edward White wrote in Wilson v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am
John Baker. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
Davis, which involves the standards for government-funded investigations to establish an indigent defendant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and Wilson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:23 am
Davis and Wilson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
On Monday the court heard argument in Wilson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Wilson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 3:53 am
Briefly: Subscript offers a graphic explainer on Wilson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:28 am
See Brecht v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
R. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:45 am
Baker and three others. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note… [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
A lively discussion of the English approach to obviousness as applied in the Hospira v Genotech patent revocation application. [read post]
