Search for: "Banks v. International Trading and in v. Co., Ltd" Results 41 - 60 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
We agree with Dr Oppong that PIL has a role to play in making Nigeria attractive for international trade and commerce. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc v Tael One Partners Ltd, heard 17 November 2014. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:25 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Australian bank was a public company, whose shares did not trade on a U.S. exchange. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Quadrangle Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 am by Sean Wajert
At the end of the term, the Supreme Court decided two important personal jurisdiction cases, J.McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
: (IP Dragon),China acts to boost patents on publicly funded research: (Intellectual Property Watch),Fighting local protectionism: (China Hearsay),Proposed changes to trade mark law: (International Law Office)DenmarkParallel import not in violation of trade mark rights: (International Law Office),World first record label using creative commons license is Danish: (Innovationpartners)EuropeCroatia and Norway ratify… [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 Petitioner’s civil claims for malicious prosecution, fraud, violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and the Texas Finance Code stem from Cash Biz’s instigation of criminal charges against Petitioners based on false assertions. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:36 pm
Collotta, Q Capital Investment Partners, LP, DSJ International Resources Ltd. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
International Trade Commission, Sct. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc v Tael One Partners Ltd, heard 17 November 2014. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Kelly
No. 337-TA-615 (ITC 337 Update) Hewlett-Packard – Initial determination terminates Mipo International Ltd. and Shenzhen Print Media Co., Ltd. from Inv. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Lurgi Energie Und Entsorgung GmbH- the matter was dismissed for becoming infructuous on 07.01.2007- see order]09.03.2006: Delhi High Court stayed proceedings before it.03.04.2007: In view of the dismissal of Civil Appeal 339/ 2003, the Supreme Court listed the matter alongwith Civil Appeal 7019/2005-Bharat Aluminium Co. v. [read post]