Search for: "Bartlett v. Strickland"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Following the release of orders, the Court will hear argument in: Bartlett v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
(Bartlett v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Friedman (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-689 Case name: Bartlett v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
Strickland and Thornburg v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:27 am
The Court then turned to the applicable review in the current case, explaining that under Strickland v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
His opinion in Bartlett v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
(Bartlett v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Opinion below (11th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 07-689 Case name: Bartlett v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:39 am
Harris 15-1262Issue: (1) Whether the court below erred in presuming racial predominance from North Carolina's reasonable reliance on this Court's holding in Bartlett v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am
Strickland, 2009). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2005. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:26 pm
Kennedy in Bartlett v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
Ct. 1456 (2009), Bartlett v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
De Grandy and Bartlett v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
And from the tea leaves of recent cases, and particularly the Section 2 case of Bartlett v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Bartlett that a plaintiff who alleges he was arrested in retaliation for speech protected by the First Amendment must show that police lacked probable cause to arrest him. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
The Court spent an hour Tuesday talking about different approaches, in Bartlett v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Jennings v. [read post]
