Search for: "Batson v. Batson" Results 41 - 60 of 689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2015, 1:12 pm
Wallace, Indiana University Maurer School of Law Class of 2016April 8, 2015While the Supreme Court has decided to remain silent on the matter, courts differ on whether to extend Batson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:33 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The Court heard oral arguments today in Foster v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 4:07 pm
As the article below indicates, earlier this month the New Jersey Supreme Court in New Jersey v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:28 am
Texas, the white defendant argued that the State of Texas violated his 6th Amendment rights under Batson v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:03 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Missing Faith in Batson: Continued Discrimination Against African Americans Through Religion-Based Peremptory Challenges   Christie Stancil Matthews Abstract:      African Americans continue to be routinely and disproportionately excluded from juries over a quarter of a century after the United States Supreme Court, in Batson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:20 am by Dan Filler
This from the folks at the University of Iowa: CALL FOR PAPERS:  For a proposed symposium  to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 9:15 am
The People, pursuant to Batson (Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986]), objected to these challenges arguing that the challenges constituted a discriminatory pattern on the basis of gender. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:05 am by uwlegalscholarship
The University of Iowa College of Law invites submissions for a proposed symposium to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am by Steve Vladeck
In a ruling perhaps more noteworthy for an unusually testy exchange between two of the Justices in the majority, a five-to-four Supreme Court on Thursday sided with California in Davis v. [read post]