Search for: "Begum v. Begum"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
As Collins J said in R v Newham LBC ex parte Begum the court will not unreasonably enforce the duty. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:10 am
In this decision, by different routes, the Court of Appeal has held that the House of Lords decision in R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Ferdous Begum [1993] AC 509 remains good law, thus effectively putting to one side the significant developments in what I would call the governmentality of persons without capacity. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm
Poplar Housing & Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Begum & Ors [2017] EWHC 2040 (QB) We are no fans of illegal subletting of social housing here at NL. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
Instead the Chamber concentrated its attention on two admittedly obiter statements, respectively by Hale LJ (as she then was) in the Court of Appeal in Adan, and Lord Millett in Runa Begum. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:05 am
., Justice Mosaics: How Context Shapes Transitional Justice in Fractured Societies (ICTJ, 2017), pp. 302-343.Nuno Ferreira, Commentary on the Re-Written Judgment in R (on the Application of Begum) V. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
The court begins the opinion by explaining thatAfter Sahar Begum Ali's psychologist terminated their therapeutic relationship, Ms. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 8:20 am
Criminal procedure — Ineffective assistance of counsel — Failure to object to detective’s expert testimony After Sahar Begum Ali’s psychologist terminated their therapeutic relationship, Ms. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
This was followed in Rikha Begum v LB of Tower Hamlets [2005] EWCA Civ 340. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 12:31 pm
However, the test in Rikha Begum v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:35 am
Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:55 am
Noor Begum. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:41 pm
So it was with some interest that I read the Court of Appeal decision in Begum v Birmingham City Council [2015] EWCA Civ 386. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 9:53 am
Tahra Begum v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
Ms T argued that Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36 supported this argument. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 11:06 am
By Ming Henderson and Razia Begum With the increasing number of disputes and client queries regarding confidential information in the United Kingdom, the recent case of Personnel Hygiene Services Ltd & ors v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 1:37 pm
The consequence of this will be more litigation and our attention has been drawn to a recent High Court challenge to a decision made by LB Newham to accommodate a family in Liverpool in performance of its s.193(2) duty (Loylu Begum v LB Newham CO/5827/2013-unreported).Ms Begum’s household included a disabled son, who suffered from behavioural impairment, focal onset epilepsy and suicidal tendencies, which were liable (according to the medical evidence) to be… [read post]
27 May 2013, 1:37 pm
The consequence of this will be more litigation and our attention has been drawn to a recent High Court challenge to a decision made by LB Newham to accommodate a family in Liverpool in performance of its s.193(2) duty (Loylu Begum v LB Newham CO/5827/2013-unreported).Ms Begum’s household included a disabled son, who suffered from behavioural impairment, focal onset epilepsy and suicidal tendencies, which were liable (according to the medical evidence) to be… [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
