Search for: "Bell Sports, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Bell Sports, Inc., 651 F.3d 357, 365 (3d Cir. 2011)(In this decision, which is after the dismissal of the appeal by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Bugosh and before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's reaffirmation of the Restatement (Second) as the proper standard in Beard v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
After expressly stating the test of essentiality/non-essentiality, Justice Binnie later restated his test as a test of non- essentiality as follows: It would be unfair to allow a patent monopoly to be breached with impunity by a copycat device that simply switched bells and whistles, to escape the literal claims of the patent. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:54 pm by Nat
In December of 2010, our firm filed a lawsuit against Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. for the permanent internal and external damage a young boy sustained when he was struck in the head with a ball hit by an Easton metal baseball bat. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 8:06 am
It also names Riddell Inc., the official NFL helmet maker, as a defendant and affiliated companies including Riddell's parent corporation, Easton-Bell Sports Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   The decision in the Smith & Wesson case follows shortly after a similar decision in a case in the Eastern District of Louisiana involving Tidewater, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
North America, Inc., 971 A. 2d 1228 (Pa. 2009)(dismissing appeal asking whether, in product liability actions in Pennsylvania, to move from Section 402A of the Second Restatement of Torts to Section 2 of the Third Restatement of Torts: Product Liability). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am by Bexis
Bell Sports, Inc., 651 F.3d 357 (3d Cir. 2011), in which the Third Circuit reaffirmed its Berrier prediction and rejected all the other side's folderol about what Bugosh-related tea leaves might or might mean. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
In this piece for the Guardian, Emily Bell, professor of professional practice at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism and a Pulitzer juror 2011/2012, comments on the significance of the HuffPo win. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:27 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Bell Sports, Inc., 651 F.3d 357 (3d Cir. 2011), and "[r]ecogniz[ing] the continuing state of disrepair in the arena of Pennsylvania strict-liability design defect law"). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:11 am by Bexis
Bell Sports, Inc., 651 F.3d 357 (3d Cir. 2011), and "[r]ecogniz[ing] the continuing state of disrepair in the arena of Pennsylvania strict-liability design defect law"). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:18 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
But in the late 2000s, the Court issued a pair of decisions—Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]