Search for: "Benham v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm by sydniemery
Arnold Loewy & Charles Moster, It’s debatable: Can a state restrict concealed carry rights of non-residents? [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 7:47 am by fjhinojosa
., The Atlantic (Sept. 29, 2021), available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/09/all-things-you-have-do-when-loved-one-dies/620240/v 2. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am by fjhinojosa
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm by bndmorris
Casto’s article “Dear Sister Antillico…”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Benham, E-Discovery: Direct Access of Electronic Devices After in Re Marion Shipman, 82 TEX. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm by sydniemery
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by ngodridge
  In the ongoing appeal and in a recent statement by Chairman Rostin Benham, the CFTC has maintained its position that elections gambling contracts are illegal, but noted that it will continue to police election betting markets while further proceedings play out.[4] BACKGROUND While the term “event contract” is not defined in CFTC regulations, event contracts are generally understood to be a type of derivative contract, , typically with a binary “Yes” or… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm by fjhinojosa
Benham’s article Tangled Incentives: Proportionality and the Market for Reputation Harm is cited in the following article: Miriam H. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]