Search for: "Berlin v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act protects Kenya by withholding subject-matter jurisdiction, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit explained in the matter Community Finance Group v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 6:02 am
In Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:18 pm
On April 14, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the May 4, 2010 judgment issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in the case of Zapolski v. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
The confirmation of an arbitral award against a state and allegations of ambiguity characterize the case of Duke Energy International Peru Investments No.1 Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 8:13 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted the summary reversal of a garnishment order in the matter FG Hemisphere Associates LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:22 pm
Whether the decision in the case C-645/11, Land Berlin v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:46 am
Today, the United States Court of Appeals in New York City ruled against the Republic of Argentina in the matter NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:45 pm
These limits are outlined in a Ninth Circuit decision of July 16, 2012, Terenkian v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:05 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City agreed with the lower court that the confirmation of the award must also be sought in Bulgaria, not in the United States under Article V of the Convention on the Recognation and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:00 pm
Only peripherally mentioned, as an interest party, is a foreign state in the arbitration and anti-suit injunction decision rendered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 7, 2007 in the matter Karaha Bodas Co., LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
ENC Corporation et al., docket number 04-16401, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit resolved the indispensable party issue with respect to the Republic of the Philippines, Arelma, Roxas and Golden Buddha in favor of human rights victims, confirming the Hawaiian district court decision on September 12, 2006. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:29 pm
The November 14, 2011 ruling from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the matter Purcell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
These cases were decided by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 USC §1602 et seq. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington, DC. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City followed the Supreme Court and, on June 28, 2010, affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded the lower court's decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Conclusion The potential impact of any judgment of the CJEU on the exportability of these benefits, and its interpretation by the Supreme Court remains to be seen, but it is another case raising the pertinent issue of free movement and social security in Europe (see the recent CJEU judgment in Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa, Sonita, Valentina and Valentino Alimanovic (C-67/14). [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:00 pm
Peterson et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:15 pm
Perles et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 9:34 pm
In addition to its more major problems, NMCCA's opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
McClurg, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington, DC. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Based on a statement of interest filed by the State Department with the court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter of La Reunion Aerienne v. [read post]
