Search for: "Bernstein v. Bernstein"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,037
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
That assumption has been undermined by Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 12:05 am
Rev. 143 (2023): The Supreme Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 7:39 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:19 pm
In Arc Mercer, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 5:56 pm
SFFA v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:03 am
Surely, not all "'federal grant-in-aid benefits, drafting of legislation, urban and regional planning, business planning, and academic and social studies'" that flow from census data collection, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm
They undermine meritocracy in much the same way as racial preferences in higher education do, except much more so: The recent Supreme Court case about affirmative action in university admissions (SFFA v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428,430 (1st Dept. 1990). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
Before Trial (TRG 2023) ¶8:2247 citing Bernstein v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:18 pm
On that latter point, I agree with co-blogger David Bernstein. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
, Best v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:20 pm
On Tuesday, in Nuziard v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:51 am
The settlement of the wife’s elective share claim does not utterly refute plaintiffs’ allegations of proximate cause because the complaint supports the inference that the settlement was effectively compelled by defendants’ malpractice (see Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 429-430 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:37 pm
From today's decision of the New York appellate court in Bernstein v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:40 pm
The star of the show in the Appellate Division decision, Joseph Bernstein v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:23 pm
Harper, the… Continue reading The post Richard Bernstein: Time to Unanimously Dismiss Moore v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 5:01 am
In Bernstein v. [read post]
