Search for: "Bevis v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie hopes that in Janus v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:41 pm
Not wanting to waste a good rant, I feel compelled to follow up Saturday's screed about the posting by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors of Watters v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
Finally, in State v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 10:21 am
MacALISTER, Appellant, v. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 4:03 pm
The first case, Twitter v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:07 am
The latter happened last week in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 10:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
PLNU students have a killer view of the Pacific and a fair number of students who surf, so perhaps Ben was at one point one of the bevy of "Nazbos" who occasionally find their way north and surf the break in front of my home.)How about on the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 3:58 am
Here is the question in Bevis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 12:16 pm
A picture is worth . . . 5,475 days.United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am
(I will spare you a rehash of the meaning of “established by the state. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
To have a complete scenario on what's going on with that, the European Commission published a public consultation on it, seeking views from a whole bevy of interested parties about their experiences in enforcing IP rights in Europe. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
(See: Bevis v Renaissance Wine Merchants Ltd. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision this week in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
On the other hand, recognizing a general right to counsel in collateral state post-conviction proceedings whenever a claim could not have been raised on direct appeal would have dramatic consequences both with respect to the timing and cost of collateral state post-conviction review (not to mention that it would arguably be inconsistent with the Court’s 1991 decision in Coleman v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:52 am
It was in that capacity where, at the tender age of 26, he represented the respondent in Gideon v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
United States decision means. [read post]
