Search for: "Black v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission" Results 41 - 60 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
  The deterrent effect of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s enforcement intensity on illegal insider trading: evidence from run-up before news events. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The Supreme Court handed down decisions in four argued cases today, including long-awaited decisions in cases concerning whether states may tax out-of-state retailers and the constitutionality of Administrative Law Judges at the Securities & Exchange Commission. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), which Congress created to hear appeals from military commissions such as the one in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:04 am by Philip Bobbitt
In 1993, for example, Russia successfully used a gas shutoff to pressure Ukraine to accept gas debt forgiveness in exchange for allowing Russia to retain most of its Black Sea naval fleet. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities and Exchange Commission, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), that the SEC’s ability to recover funds through disgorgement is subject to a five-year statute of limitations. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
It no doubt explains why Spotify and China's internet giant Tencent exchanged equity stakes of just under 10 per cent of each other, and why Tencent now has a $2 billion stake in Snapchat. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Sarah Grant
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Sarah Grant
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
The Parkers asserted that IB's acts and omissions, involving an extreme degree of risk, were grossly negligent, IB had actual awareness of the risk involved, but proceeded with conscious indifference, and IB had violated the Texas Securities Act.[3] The Parkers claimed that IB's breaches of duty had caused them a loss of $725,779 and IB had profited $44,807 in commissions, fees, and interest. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
And although Comey testified that during the dinner his own impression was that Trump was “looking to get something in exchange for granting my request to stay in the job,” by Comey’s own account no such exchange was given explicit mention. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, the court held 9-0 that because SEC disgorgement operates as a penalty, the five-year statute of limitations applies to a claim for disgorgement in an SEC enforcement action. [read post]