Search for: "Block v. Smith"
Results 41 - 60
of 813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
California (1973), though with extra detail added by Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
It also blocks the historic promotion of Admiral Lisa Franchetti to head the U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
Smith, 70 F.4th 198 (June 6, 2023). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
In four cases, Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett declined to cast the deciding votes that would have blocked the enforcement of vaccine mandates: Dunn v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:04 am
The transition from first-to-invent to first-to-file has involved a number of quirks, the latest is found in SNIPR Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Biden v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
Their primary objective was to have Vice President Mike Pence in his presiding role on that day either block Congress from recognizing Joe Biden’s win at all or at least to delay the electoral count. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:32 am
Nev. 2022); see also Smith v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Canada Google has announced that it will block news links in Canada in response to the mandated payment for links approach established in Bill C-18. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
First, an apology for the title. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
“...EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT, PLUS THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, TOTALLY EXONERATED ME FROM THE CONTINUING WITCH HUNT BROUGHT ON BY CORRUPT JOE BIDEN, THE DOJ, DERANGED JACK SMITH, AND THEIR RADICAL LEFT, MARXIST THUGS…” --Donald Trump, June 15, 2023 The notion that presidents—and, for that matter, the rest of the federal government—must preserve their records is of recent vintage. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
That was fortunate because Mr Justice Marcus Smith, the President of the CAT, suspended the livestream for the first couple of hours. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:47 pm
"] In Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
Blume v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
The full 742 page, 2618 paragraph judgment, Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 41) [2023] FCA 555, was published on 5 June 2023. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:18 pm
Mr Justice Marcus Smith--the UK's top antitrust-specialized judge (President of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CATribunal or just CAT)) as well as a technically savvy patent judge--has indeed assigned the highest possible priority to the adjudication of Microsoft's appeal of the Competition & Markets Authority's (CMA) attempt to block Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard King (ABK, NASDAQ:ATVI). [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:57 pm
These courts and the Smith court were informed by Riley v. [read post]
