Search for: "Blowers v. Blowers" Results 41 - 60 of 344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm by Samantha Maddern
In contrast, in The Environmental Group Ltd v Peter Bowd[5], a CEO claimed he was subjected to an investigation into his alleged misconduct, suspended and then sacked because he was a ‘whistle-blower’ – he had raised concerns in a report to the Board, and then lodged a complaint with ASIC, about alleged financial irregularities. [read post]
Leveson, in the preceding paragraph of the ENRC judgment, states that it is “obviously in the public interest that companies should be prepared to investigate allegations from whistle blowers or investigative journalists, prior to going to a prosecutor such as the SFO, without losing the benefit of legal professional privilege for the work product and consequences of their investigation. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:01 am by Public Employment Law Press
Retaliation against an employee for reporting improper governmental action prohibited by Civil Service Law §75-b, the "Whistleblower Statute"Lilley v Greene Cent. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
(iv) Protecting whistleblowers is contrary to the values and beliefs imbedded in American culture: (v) Punishing and preventing bad corporate behavior is a difficult task, depending on moral condemnation and economic pain. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]