Search for: "Boe v. Boe"
Results 41 - 60
of 676
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:17 am
(LOT) filed its 143-page complaint against The Boeing Company (Boeing). [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
Boeing Co., 392 Ill. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:03 am
El BOE de 23 de marzo de 2023 publica la Ley Orgánica 2/2023, de 22 de marzo, del Sistema Universitario. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:09 pm
Recently in Cothron v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 1:15 am
También me llama la atención, aunque puedo entenderlo, el art.13.5 de la Ley 2/2023 que establece que: «5.Las decisiones adoptadas por los organismos públicos con funciones de comprobación o investigación en relación con las informaciones no serán recurribles en vía administrativa ni en vía contencioso-administrativa». [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm
In the latest development in the Delaware courts’ evolving elucidation of the standards surrounding claims for breach of the duty of oversight – sometimes referred to as Caremark claims — a Delaware Court has held that the board of McDonald’s cannot be held liable for an alleged oversight duty breach in connection with the alleged scandals at the company involving sexual harassment allegations. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:35 am
The case, Chason v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:22 am
Since Curtis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
See Marchand v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
For example, in 2020, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed both prongs of Caremark in the Teamsters v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am
In a shareholder claim against the former global head of HR at McDonald’s, the Delaware Chancery Court has held that liability for breach of the duty of oversight, which Delaware courts had previously extended only to corporate directors, can also extend to corporate officers, as well. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm
The proposed changes to marking requirements go beyond the SBIR/STTR Policy Directive and respond to the Federal Circuit’s decision in The Boeing Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Boeing Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2022 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
Oh, not about those crashes—they sue about having flown on Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft that brought them safely to their destinations. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
In Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund v. [read post]
