Search for: "Book v. Arnold" Results 41 - 60 of 310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 4:39 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
ACLU news this week included some victories — our FAA challenge will go forward, the Google books settlement was rejected, Afghan activist Malalai Joya got her visa to visit the USA — and some new and continuing challenges for us — outrageous abortion law in South Dakota and evolution v. creationism in Tennesee redux. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:33 am by Sophie Corke
PatentsGuestKat Léon Dijkman provided an index of some of the most interesting issues in Arnold LJ's wide-ranging FibroGen v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act Never too late 90 [week ending on Sunday 3 April] – Book review: "IP and Other Things" by Sir Robin Jacob| Book review:  "Trade Marks Law" by Glen Gibbons| IPKat Post #10,00 | Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others |Two Book Reviews: European Law… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Civil Rights”—Motley litigated hundreds of cases that remade American law and society, including Brown v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am by Sophie Corke
 Never Too Late 292 [Week ending November 22] [Guest post] The Implementation of Article 17 CDSMD in EU Member States and the Evolution of the Digital Services Act: Why the Ban on General Monitoring Obligations Must Not Be Underestimated | Cannabis, conceptual comparison, and online evidence: Tertulia on EUIPO Boards of Appeal Case Law November 2020 | Mind the gap: Beijing IP Court explains the adverse effect clause of China’s Trade Mark Law | [Guest… [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:28 pm by Chiara Gallo
The post highlights the reasoning adopted by Arnold LJ considering the post-Brexit implications on the UK copyright law.Geographical IndicationsJocelyn Bosse addressed the recent judgement of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco v Australian Grape and Wine Incorportated [2023] SGCA 37 and the registration of ‘Prosecco’ as a GI in Singapore. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:03 pm by Mark Walsh
There is some extra wattage here this morning for arguments in one of the marquee cases of the new term, Gill v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
Premier League v BT, UEFA v BT, Matchroom v BT and Queensberry v BT). [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 7:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This concept was discussed by the Texas Supreme Court in 1987, in the case Arnold v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
 | Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko  [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Michael Sirkin
Motive matters in M&A litigation, too, according to UCLA law professor Stephen Bainbridge in his e-book, Directors as Auctioneers—A Concise Guide to Revlon-Land.[1] This notion is not unique to Bainbridge, as Chancellor Leo E. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
"Unification of copyright law", explains Eleonora -- who wrote a book on that very subject a couple of years ago. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 10:33 am by J
Arnold v Britton [2012] EWHC 2451(Ch) is the third holiday chalet / service charge case we’ve covered in short order (the other two are here and here). [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 10:33 am by J
Arnold v Britton [2012] EWHC 2451(Ch) is the third holiday chalet / service charge case we’ve covered in short order (the other two are here and here). [read post]