Search for: "Boone County Court v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
Michael Venis' trial is scheduled to begin Oct. 16 in Boone County Superior Court II. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm by Jason Starling
By Jason Starling In what looks to be an ominous development for public-sector unions, the United States Supreme Court, on June 30, 2015, granted a petition for certiorari by the plaintiffs in Friedrichs v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:26 am
Boone, a Montgomery County medical malpractice informed consent case. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:26 am
Boone, a Montgomery County medical malpractice informed consent case. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in Shapsis v Kogan ; 2011 NY Slip Op 50014(U) ; Decided on January 7, 2011 Supreme Court, Kings County ; Demarest, J. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court, and Diane and I prevailed on the same issue in a follow-up Ninth Circuit case, Boone v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The court declines to dismiss plaintiffs cause of action for legal malpractice pursuant to CPLR § 321 l(a)(l), on the basis of plaintiffs llocution under oath, because New York State courts have not taken a consistent position on whether an allocution that a client was satisfied with the services of his/her attorney precludes a client from bringing a claim for legal malpractice (See Boone v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm by Michael Tan, Immigrants' Rights Project
The ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project filed a friend-of-the-court brief (PDF) in the case, Martinez v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am by Daniel E. Cummins
CumminsThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s much-anticipated decision in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:15 pm
The Boone County Family Court Commissioner rejected Michelle's motion, but on appeal Circuit Court Judge Gary G. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:53 am by Lovechilde
Shelby County, Alabama v Holder  (2010) is challenging the constitutionality of section 5. [read post]