Search for: "Bounds v. Commonwealth"
Results 41 - 60
of 244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2009, 4:07 am
Back in January, we put up a short post noting the filing of a petition for extraordinary ("King's Bench") review in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 11:00 pm
Caldwell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 8:52 am
In Cameron v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The deed conveying the 1.44 acres contained a metes and bounds description of only the strip of land conveyed to the Commonwealth. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
Martin v. [read post]
Pennsylvania Courts Rule Birchfield Does Not Prohibit a License Suspension for Refusing a Blood Test
29 Aug 2018, 9:29 am
The Commonwealth court noted the same issue was ruled upon in a previous case and held it was bound by that ruling. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm
Chan and Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
She was not contractually bound to do so and received no remuneration for her role. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 7:21 am
The Commonwealth Court dismissed her case. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:22 pm
In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:37 am
Thus, [Wells] is bound by Instruction No. 4ii, i.e., that the Commonwealth need not prove appellant personally benefitted from the misappropriation. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:49 am
In Jersey City POBA v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm
Heytens is solicitor general and Martine Cicconi is deputy solicitor general of the Commonwealth of Virginia, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of 15 states and the District of Columbia in support of the respondent in Trump v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 1:32 pm
From Khoraki v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:32 am
Breard v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:57 am
The following is a guest post by Clare Feikert-Ahalt, foreign law specialist for the United Kingdom and a number of Commonwealth jurisdictions at the Law Library of Congress. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Supreme Court—South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:55 pm
The Australian Law Reform Commission has recommended the creation of a commonwealth statute to protect against serious invasions of privacy. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm
Furthermore, the court found that the Commonwealth Court’s articulation of a functionally obsolete standard for unnecessary hardship was unsupported even under its own cited precedent, and that the ZBA’s decision on every issue raised was within the bounds of reason and therefore represented a sound exercise of discretion. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:23 pm
” Rowe v. [read post]
