Search for: "Bradley et al" Results 41 - 60 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Foreign Policy and National Security Interests, (Just Security, 2017).Mark Stern, et. al., The Judicial and Generational Dispute over Transgender Rights, (Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, Forthcoming).Mark Strasser, Marriage, Divorce, and Domicile, (85 University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 145-86 (2016)).Dana Brakman Reiser, Disruptive Philanthropy: Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability Company, and the Millionaire next Door, (Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Mark Weidemaier
., Bradley et al. (2017), Nordvig (2015), Chamon et al. (2014), Clare & Schmidlin (2014), Choi et al. (2014)). [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Next Door Company, et al., a claimant proceeding “without the aid of competent counsel” would be as “helpless as a turtle on its back. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
French, et al Disparities In Cancer Care And Costs At The End Of Life: Evidence From England’s National Health ServiceBrendan Walsh and Mauro Laudicella Challenges Of Measuring Quality Of Community-Based Programs For Seriously Ill Individuals And Their FamiliesJoan M. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm by Jamie Baker
Spece Jr. et al., (Implicit) Consent to Intimacy, 50 IND. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Follow Culture Secretary Karen Bradley’s decision that she was minded to’ refer the takeover of  Sky plc by 21st Century Fox to Ofcom there have been a large number of representations supporting such a reference. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:37 pm by Amanda Pickens
Here is a recap of February’s filings: Bradley, et al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
This is a live blog of the first day of the hearing of the “Brexit” appeal. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:36 am by David DePaolo
Last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Clement et al v. [read post]