Search for: "Brady v. C. I. R" Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(EPLAW) Cheapflights: OHIM excludes likelihood of confusion between conflicting signs, due to very low degree of distinctive character of earlier marks: T-460/09; T-461/09  (Class 46) General Court upholds opposition brought  by PEPE JEANS against PEPEQUILLO CTM application: T-580/08 (Class 46) Royal treatment rejected in Luxembourg: T-397/09 (Class 46) ‘G’: Emram v OHIM: Guilty against Gucci (Class 46) General Court: summer time I and II – ‘Space… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Washington, No. 07-1523, 07-1884, 07-2541 Federal district courts lack the inherent power to vacate a sentence procured by fraud, any such power having been abrogated by the enactment of 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c) and the amendments to FRCP 35. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
There is a 5RB case comment on the decision of the Court of Appeal  in R v Markham upholding the removal of anonymity from two children convicted of murder. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Muksasey , No. 07-3115 Where an alien whose previous visa application has been denied receives a visa after providing false information about his/her identity, that conduct constitutes willful misrepresentation of a material fact for purposes of 8 U.S.C. section 1182(a)(6)(C)(i). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by DaytonDUI
 Enterprising defense attorneys may also have issues under the Brady discovery rules and Ohio Criminal Rule 16 discovery. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]