Search for: "Brennan et al v. Brennan et al" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KU716.7 .N38 2015Sean Brennan et al., eds., Native Title from Mabo to Akiba: A Vehicle for Change and Empowerment? [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:33 pm
CNH America LLC, et al. , a 6-page opinion on a petition for rehearing, Sr. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm by Orin Kerr
LaFave et al., 3 Criminal Procedure § 8.13(a) (4th ed. 2017) ("[R]equiring the subpoenaed party to reveal a passcode that would allow [the government] to perform the decryption...would require a testimonial communication standing apart from the act of production, and therefore make unavailable the foregone conclusion doctrine. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 11:31 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[The Sixth Circuit joins the Eighth Circuit in recognizing the import of Chief Justice Roberts' controlling opinion in June Medical Services] On Friday, in EMW Women's Surgical Center, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
And most informed observers would agree, I think, that as a result of our government’s counterterrorism efforts, spanning both the Bush and Obama Administrations, and which have included targeted lethal force against known individuals, the U.S. homeland is safer today from a terrorist attack launched by al Qaeda from overseas. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Supreme Court – even Marshall and Brennan had to agree with Rehnquist et al. that the evidence against the hapless criminal defendant should not be suppressed.) [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:08 am
Holy Land Foundation, et al., says he believes in the maxim "justice delayed is justice denied. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents Achmed et al. and the Center for Justice and Accountability as amici curiae in support of the petitioners.] [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]