Search for: "Bridges v. Kelly" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz challenge the defendants’ use of images of their artwork, registered with the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:29 am by Peter Margulies
As the Supreme Court noted in a case cited by Tigar, Rosenberg v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:40 am
The State did not offer testimony from either Investigator Kelly Phillips or Investigator Marsha Phillips.State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
And April Doss defended the 9th Circuit’s reading of the government’s ability to use information collected through 702 surveillance in U.S. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed their convictions.Writing for the Court in Kelly v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Miller (06-962). ** Whether an individual or firm that receives a payment based on a law enacted after filing for bankruptcy must count the money as part of the estate for possible distribution to creditors (Kelly v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:54 am by Amy Howe
Kelly was convicted and sentenced to 18 months in prison for her role in “Bridgegate” – the decision to change the traffic patterns on the George Washington Bridge, creating gridlock in nearby Fort Lee, New Jersey. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
PM and the passing of punitive damages class actions (2/27/07)Nagareda (implicitly) on preemption case selection (2/26/07)The bridges from Madison county (2/25/07)The Illinois Jensen case - a class action cautionary tale (2/22/07)Another stray thought on Williams v. [read post]