Search for: "Briggs v. State of California" Results 41 - 58 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaDocket: 09-1254Issue(s): (1) Whether, in enacting a state statute extending the statute of limitations applicable to claims for the recovery of property stolen during the Holocaust against museums and galleries, the State of California was addressing an area of “traditional state responsibility” without intruding on the federal foreign affairs power; (2) whether a state statute extending the statute of… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be rec [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be reconsidered or clarified? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-8659, Garcia v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
 (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect:… [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be reconsidered or clarified? [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:09 am
The case arose out of class action litigation presently pending in the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
BOX 39 CABOOL MO-Missouri  38 Cal's Thriftway 408 West Buchanan California MO-Missouri  39 WOODS SUPER MARKET 8845 NORTH STATE HIGHWAY 5 CAMDENTON MO-Missouri  40 Country Mart 1303 N. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
"   This means that, if the amendment is construed literally, California could become a same-sex marriage mill for couples from other states, and in at least a handful of other states that lack state DOMAs or anti-marriage constitutional amendments, those marriages could be recognized -- perhaps. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]