Search for: "Briscoe v. Virginia"
Results 41 - 60
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 7:23 am
You can read the petition, in Briscoe and Cypress v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
[This is the fourteenth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 10:45 am
Virginia. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:45 am
SCOTUS comes back into session next week, and with the dismissal of Briscoe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:11 am
While litigating Briscoe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:20 pm
ADDENDUM: Keep both eyes on the Briscoe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009)(no chemist), Briscoe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
Last year, for example, much of the pre-term buzz was centered on Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:18 am
As has become her custom, Sotomayor actively questioned both sides during Monday's argument in Briscoe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am
Instead, after oral argument, the Court in Briscoe (559 U. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:30 am
Warren Bridge and Briscoe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:50 am
So when the Supreme Court decided to hear Briscoe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:15 am
Supreme Court granted – and heard – oral argument in another case just last week: Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:07 pm
The New York Times describes the possibility that the Court's decision in Briscoe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:31 am
But on Monday, the US Supreme Court granted review in Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:16 pm
Briscoe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm
City of New York and Briscoe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:38 pm
Massachusetts & Briscoe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:28 am
City of New York, No. 08-969 Opinion in Briscoe v. [read post]
