Search for: "Bristow v Bristow"
Results 41 - 60
of 164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2017, 6:32 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit’s latest ruling in the travel-ban case, Hawaii v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
Gemma Barrett (Bristows) explains what this means.More on broccoli, tomatoes, and the patentability of a plant or animal obtained by means of an essentially biological processFurther to the blog post above, Kat friend Florica Rus considers issues raised as a result of these amendments.Copyright protection of minimalist furniture designMark Schweizer reports on the recent decision made by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court clarifying the requirements for the "individual character" of… [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
* Ventsi Stoilov reports ...That the General Court of the EU ruled in Case T 638/15 Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) Inc. v EUIPO. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:23 am
This article was originally published on the website of Bristows. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:17 am
Studies show that women get interrupted more (no matter how senior), passed over for promotions and raises (even though entitled) and reviewed negatively for similar traits celebrated and promoted in men (bossy v leadership, arrogant v confident, etc). [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
Steven Willis (Bristows) updates readers the Court of Appeal’s decision in the first of the three related technical trials to receive judgment from the Patents Court in 2015/16. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
2 May 2017, 6:34 am
But, attendees are never in short supply, and for the latest Rapid response event following the handing down of the latest judgment in the Unwired Planet cases (see IPKat summary here) patent litigator and new AIPPI member, Rachael Cartwright (Bristows), took to expertly reporting for the IPKat. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Finally, in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:41 am
Francion Brooks (Bristows) says it is time to dispel some myths…"First, some background for anyone that missed this development. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
For those that were busy braving the dark London streets for last minute present buying instead, the ever succinct Steven Willis (Bristows) reports on the evening's festivities: "Andrew recapped that in 2016, there were 18 Patents Court judgments on issues of validity and/or infringement. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Steven Willis (Bristows) reports: "Since that first rapid response seminar, Arnold J has issued a further judgment concerning Warner-Lambert’s right to amend the Patent after the trial and whether that amounted to an abuse of process (Generics (UK) t/a Mylan v Warner-Lambert [2015] EWHC 3370 (Pat)). [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:30 pm
Jeremy Blum (Bristows) and Andrew Butcher (Bristows) explain: "Given that we can count on one hand the number of judgments on the topic of trade mark infringement in the context of key word advertising (by our count they are L’Oréal, M&S, Lush, Mr Spicy) we were unsurprisingly eager to receive last Friday’s decision of Mr Justice Carr in Victoria Plum Limited v Victorian Plumbing Ltd [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
The case also provides a useful comparator for the England and Wales Court of Appeal’s judgment on 13 October 2016 in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (EWCA Judgment) (covered by Brian Cordery of Bristows in ‘Pain and Plausibility – the Lyrica Appeal’), particularly with respect to how Australian and English law determine sufficiency and infringement of Swiss-style claims. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
Struck by this (and because her eyes glazed over that part of the decision), she asked Steven Willis (Bristows) to educate her and our readers about this aspect of the case. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
Thanks to Bristows patent litigator Vanessa Rieu for the story. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:32 pm
Vanessa reports:"In the second Pharma session on Monday, Moderator Dominic Adair (Bristows, UK) and panellists Fritz Reiter, (Regulatory CMC Team Leader, Sandoz GmbH, AT), Prof. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am
Any doubt on this issue is resolved by the CJEU decision in Solvay v Honeywell which provides a clear analogy. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
. * GS Media: IPKat/Bristows rapid response seminar Katfriend Lucie Fortune reports on the rapid response seminar at which Eleonora was joined by Aimee Nisbet, Nicholas Saunders and Theo Savvides on the panel, which was chaired by Mark Brown. [read post]
