Search for: "Brown Davis" Results 41 - 60 of 1,683
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2023, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
PDF An excerpt: In the wake of the protests calling for police reform, driven by the events surrounding the deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Michael Brown, and so many others, including Cecil Lacy (Tulalip Tribes) and Rene Davis (Muckleshoot Indian Tribe), as well as the sexual assault at the hands of the police involving L.B. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm by Sangh Rakshita
Caste-based discrimination—or differentiated treatment based on someone’s perceived ancestry—has been prohibited for decades by countries such as India and Nepal. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 12:30 am by Dennis Dimka
Arns Davis Law https://www.arnslaw.com/Practice area: Employment Law Built on: WordPress Arns Davis Law’s homepage leads with smiling faces. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  That there is doubt about how many children he has (or acknowledges) seems more important than whether or not his name is in fact Joe Brown, but I digress. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Supreme Court to Decide Landmark Texas, Florida Social Media Cases and More MSN – Ann Marimow and Cat Zakrzewski (Washington Post) | Published: 9/29/2023 The Supreme Court said it would wade into the future of free speech online and decide whether laws passed in Texas and Florida can restrict social media companies from removing certain political posts or accounts. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 10:51 am by Taylor Johnson
  The issue highlights the collaboration between Drake Law School and attorneys from Dentons Davis Brown to organize an LGBTQ+ legal clinic. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court, documents that revealed private jet flights, foreign travel, and even a bouquet of flowers that Oprah Winfrey had ordered for Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, September 22, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of September 15-21, 2023 Financial Implications of Rising Political Risk in the US Posted by Stephen Davis (Harvard Law School), on Friday, September 15, 2023 Tags: C+C, CEOs, Presidential elections, US institutions In 2022, Corporate Time Horizons Shorten, Investors’ Lengthen… [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, September 22, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of September 15-21, 2023 Financial Implications of Rising Political Risk in the US Posted by Stephen Davis (Harvard Law School), on Friday, September 15, 2023 Tags: C+C, CEOs, Presidential elections, US institutions In 2022, Corporate Time Horizons Shorten, Investors’ Lengthen… [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Former FTX Crypto Executive Pleads Guilty to Making Millions in Illegal Campaign Contributions Associated Press News – Jake Offenhartz | Published: 9/7/2023 A former top executive at the failed FTX cryptocurrency exchange pleaded guilty to making tens of millions of dollars in illegal campaign contributions and engaging in a criminal conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transfer business. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Josh Blackman
In June 2022, Justice Breyer retired, and was replaced by Justice Ketaji Brown Jackson. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan—esp. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Alyson Diaz
Gallo and Kathleen Wilber of the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology at the University of California in an article in The Gerontologist. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:55 am by jonathanturley
” That was the governing precedent from 1894 to 1954, but few denounced the Supreme Court for reversing the precedent in Brown v. [read post]