Search for: "Brown v. California Department of Corrections"
Results 41 - 60
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 7:33 am
Just this year the United States Supreme Court confirmed in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:25 am
"By the end of the this year, early part of January '09, all of our sex offenders that are under supervision of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation will be on GPS," said Robert Ambroselli, from the California Department of Corrections. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
" Letter Carriers v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 7:59 am
Was Scalia correct? [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm
During oral argument in Department of Education v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:00 am
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2011 U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:23 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm
Brown, Kilgore v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
(Garner v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
California Appellate Districts, April 01, 2008 Tosi v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 2:16 pm
(Los Angeles Times) But according to a spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections and (in General but Not in This Particular Case) Rehabilitation, "A Manson wedding did not take place. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
(“Jerry”) Brown, Jr. by Arthur F. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Collins, which reads Relator inmate filed an action in mandamus seeking a writ of mandamus to compel various employees of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections (ODRC) to provide him records related to the purchase of peanut butter for the correctional institution. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:51 pm
" Nonetheless, Judge Wolf writes, "the Eighth Amendment promises prisoners such care," citing the Supreme Court's 2011 decision in the California over-crowding case, Brown v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:27 am
State of Nevada v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Missouri Dep't of Corr., No. 07-1598 In an action raising a retaliation claim under Title VII against plaintiff's employer, a state correctional department, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, for purposes of a prima facie retaliation case: 1) a single comment at issue in the case was insufficient as a matter of law to support an objectively reasonable belief it amounted to unlawful sexual harassment; and 2) under the facts of the case, no reasonable person… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
Cases 565, and Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Cal. 2007); Brown v. [read post]
