Search for: "Brown v. Department of Agriculture"
Results 41 - 60
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
Brown, 14-10186. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 9:06 pm
Brown, which upheld a California agricultural program that reduced the output of the state’s raisin producers, in conflict with federal antitrust policy. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has limited most poultry plants to a maximum line speed of 140 birds per minute since 2014. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
In R (SK Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] 1 WLR 1527 the Court of Appeal appears to suggest that not every type of public law breach, committed after an initially valid detention, would render continued detention unlawful. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Brown/Welch v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
By Diane Kindermann and Jessica Melms Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
"The suit comes soon after the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) fully deregulated genetically modified strains of alfalfa. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court declined to rule on the merits in Zubik v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Brown, 14-10186 (a Jewish prisoner denied permission to meet and pray with others because prison officials believed there were an insufficient number of people for organized prayer under their understanding of Judaism); Ben-Levi is joined by two-time relists Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
Department of Agriculture, 576 U. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
” Steele v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Further, it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to include in the marital pot crop subsidy payments from the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") earned before and during the period of the parties' separation, but paid during the period of the parties' separation. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
RicePhoto credit: Irving Rusinow, Department of Agriculture / National Archives.When we study the history of racial segregation in America, the landmark cases are Plessy v. [read post]
