Search for: "Brown v. Dept. of Correction"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 5:55 pm
Sec‘y, Dept. of Corrections, No. 11-14498 (opinion issued October 23, 2012). [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
Brown. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Brown, 198 F. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:46 am
Brown-Serulovic, NY Slip Op 05381 (2d Dept. 2012).Here is the decision.Monday’s issue: Newly-discovered evidence. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In fact after Brown v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:49 am
” Brown v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
The Court then determined that this error was harmless, since the defendant had confessed.Whether the holding of People v Brown (13 NY3d 332) was correct will likely be decided by the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Shelby County Dept. of Corrections, No. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Title: Rast v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:59 am
Keith BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.907 N.Y.S.2d 669, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. 2010. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
Keith BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.2010 WL 3701321, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.,2010. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:05 am
Keith Brown, Defendant-Appellant.--- N.Y.S.2d ----, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. 2010., 3238_________________________ Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, 982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:04 am
Brown (1st Dept., decided 10/8/2009) This is a troubling decision. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:14 am
The agreements required class counsel to apply to a court for an incentive award for the named plaintiffs, and tied the named plaintiffs' compensation to a sliding scale based on the amount recovered.State, Dept. of Transp. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 3:34 am
Orange County Corrections Dept., No. 6:07-cv-588-Orl, 2009 WL 248230 (M.D. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
" "Such appeals to emotion tend to deflect the jurors' attention from issues of fact on the question of guilt or innocence" (People v Bowie, 200 AD2d 511, 513, lv denied 83 NY2d 869), and cause them instead to focus on protecting the victim and correcting an alleged error in the child protective system (see generally People v Ivey, 83 AD2d 788, 789). [read post]
