Search for: "Brown v. Justice" Results 41 - 60 of 5,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2007, 6:59 am
Blog contributor Lauren Weldon and a few friends attended a Federalist Society debate titled, "Can Originalists Defend Brown v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:22 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Brown (Queen's University Belfast - School of Law and Queen's University Belfast - School of Law) have posted Disability and Access to Sex Workers: Secretary of State for Justice v A Local Authority and others... [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:40 am
After all, Justice Scalia was part of a majority that went as far as it could to undermine the integrationist intent of Brown. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:48 am by emagraken
Justice Chamberlist relied on the rule in Browne v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:42 pm by Orly Lobel
This week at USD law school we held an event celebrating 60 years to Brown v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:53 am
“I understand Justice Brown looking at this and going, ‘OK, there are some things that concern me. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 11:41 pm
During the oral argument, CJ Roberts suggested that Brown v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:20 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Argument analysis: Justices dubious of government's broad reading of False Claims ActDear readers: I commend to you the excellent analysis by Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog of the oral argument held today at the Supreme Court in the case of Kellogg Brown and Root v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:35 am by JB
Now that it is clear that Justice Scalia did not say that he would have dissented from Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Judge Brown Jackson clerked for Justice Breyer in the 1999 Term, when Rice v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am by DARRYL HUTCHEON, MATRIX
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm by Erin Miller
Much of the Supreme Court’s moral capital rests on two Warren Court decisions, Brown v. [read post]