Search for: "Buff v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2016, 1:45 pm
 That's a neat little topic for civil procedure academics (and/or buffs), and I count myself as at least one of these. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:18 am by Terry Hart
But it does, no doubt, involve a set of facts that should spark the interest of copyright buffs, and the First Circuit’s opinion is fairly clear and straightforward. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:50 pm
The transcript of the oral argument in Sole v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 9:48 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
  Also, because the clause lacks a definition of contractor, the letter cites United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The floor goes to Katfriend Tove Graulund.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt:… [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am by Adam Chandler
For a second day, media outlets are flush with analysis of Monday’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:08 pm
It is mandatory reading for Civil War buffs. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
No one suggested that the Fourteenth Amendment was about empowering Congress to achieve such Article I, Section 8ish goals as eradicating the remnants of the slave system or ensuring that states protected and protected equally fundamental rights.Professor Schwartz nevertheless provides constitutional Civil War buffs with cause for optimism. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:45 am
See: SEC Press Release Complaint filed in US v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]