Search for: "Burke v State of New York" Results 41 - 60 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A recent ABA Section on Litigation publication quoted Professor Cassandra Burke Robertson, who observed that "the biggest question about Rule 8.4(g) has been whether it unconstitutionally infringes on lawyers' speech rights—and after the Court's decision in [NIFLA v.] [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Tim Wu argues that Monday’s decision in Ohio v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 The affidavit of service filed with the New York County Clerk on December 7, 2017 reveals that nonparty Dusty Burke (Burke) served defendants on October 27, 2017 by leaving the summons and complaint with their receptionist at their business located at 299 Broadway, Suite 1405, in New York County. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:15 am
And in New York City, a woman attacked for her actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity while eating brunch at a Sizzler restaurant reached a settlement with the restaurant and its manager under New York City and New York State’s gender violence laws. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:15 am
And in New York City, a woman attacked for her actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity while eating brunch at a Sizzler restaurant reached a settlement with the restaurant and its manager under New York City and New York State’s gender violence laws. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Burke PC v Aezah 2017 NY Slip Op 32670(U) December 14, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654778/2016 Judge: David B. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Litvin, New York, New York, for amicus National Basketball Association. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the determination of the maximum enlargement of the building permissible under New York law was the type of determination that required specialized knowledge, and thus, that expert evidence testimony was required to determine whether the defendants exercised due care in making that determination (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d at 777; Michael v He Gin Lee Architect Planner, PLLC, 153 AD3d 704). [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]