Search for: "Burns v. Cities Service Company" Results 41 - 60 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am by John Bolesta and Keahn Morris
.,[1] the Obama board in 2015 upended the existing case law by finding that a company contracting for services could be deemed a joint employer of the service provider’s employees if the company indirectly exercised control over the employment terms/conditions through the contractor or merely reserved that right to control — even though it might not have been exercised. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
Media companies that fail to comply face a fine of up to a 1 million Singapore dollars (about $722,000). [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:23 am by Richard Hunt
The court found there was no ADA violation because the service (booking a tour) was accessible and the company offices were not at issue. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Nothing new here: In most of the largest cities, every year seems to bring a new record. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
The High Court held: Any decision on ‘good reason’ was not influenced by the merits of the appeal – Short v Birmingham City Council (2005) EWHC 2112. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:44 pm by petrocohen
These types of burns are, for obvious reasons, more prevalent among those working in the electrical or construction industry or individuals who work for utility companies. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:27 am by vforberger
Cities had water and sewer services that in some instances were collectively run or in other instances were operated by private companies. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 11:05 am by James Innocent
Both Washart and the restaurant laid the bulk of the blame on its beer supplier and service contractor, Kramer Beverage Company. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:30 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers, Stephanie Zable
Chris Ghazarian, DreamHost’s general counsel, noted that some requested information was outside of what DreamHost had preserved so the company would need additional time to produce the records. [read post]