Search for: "Burns v. Municipal Court" Results 41 - 60 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by Jeff Gamso
Beasley, a 1984 decision.This court in Colegrove v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
   Other courts, though, like the 8th District in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals opined in Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] "expresses this State's strong commitment to open government and public accountability and imposes a broad standard of disclosure upon the State and its agencies. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals opined in Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] "expresses this State's strong commitment to open government and public accountability and imposes a broad standard of disclosure upon the State and its agencies. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm by Andrew Hamm
Department of Social Services, the Supreme Court ruled that municipalities could be liable under Section 1983 only for their own illegal acts, which could include actions taken pursuant to a municipality’s official policy. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:38 pm by WIMS
Feb 23: In response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:11 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada today released its decision in R. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:36 pm
We handle all NJ Municipal Court cases including DUI in the following NJ Municipal Courts: Hopewell Township, Ewing Township, Trenton, Lawrence Township, Hamilton, Pennington, and other Mercer County, Burlington County, and Camden County, NJ courts. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
Burns, Mathur The hybrid group was run by Richard Burns, a London-based Citigroup veteran, according to two people familiar with the group who asked not to be named because they aren’t authorized to speak about the matter. [read post]