Search for: "Burns v. Sharp"
Results 41 - 60
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2016, 9:37 am
He said the morning after the release of the opinion in Texas v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 4:22 am
In Wong v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
Australia In the case of Reid v Dukic ([2016] ACTSC 344) Burns J award Aus$180,000 damages for a series of posts of an “irrational or ranting” posts on Facebook. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
I particularly appreciated Breyer’s sharp observation that a court “should never be influenced by the weather of the day but inevitably . . . will be influenced by the climate of the era. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Drawing inspiration from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Drawing inspiration from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Drawing inspiration from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Juliana v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:05 pm
Alito Jr. delivers a crisp summary of Limelight Networks Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
On the same day Sharp LJ refused the application for permission to appeal in the case of Theedom v Nourish Training. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:03 pm
Arguing for a Pennsylvania man in the case of Elonis v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The owner of Rangers football club, Craig Whyte, is suing the BBC and Robert Burns, head of investigations at the Insolvency Service, for defamation. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:22 pm
Rochin v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
When the pundits discuss Scalia's legacy, they usually emphasize his decisions on guns or flag-burning, or his sharp dissents in cases involving the death penalty or gay rights. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:21 am
Rose and Brooks’s work, though, convinces me the line between the two theories is not nearly so sharp as I had thought. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
That is only one of many discoveries his fresh eyes and sharp mind spotted. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
There are a number of resolved cases to report, including: Mr Phillip Scofield v Best, Clause 1, 30/03/2012; Mr Craig Whittaker MP v Halifax Evening Courier, Clause 1, 29/03/2012; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 28/03/2012; A man v Daily Mail, clause 1, 3, 5, 28/03/2012; Mr Nathan Roberts v Daily Mail, clause 1, 2, 28/03/2012; Mr Andrew Morgan v The Sun, clause 1, 28/03/2012; Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, clause 12, 26/03/2012. [read post]
