Search for: "Buxton v. Buxton" Results 41 - 60 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm by INFORRM
  Buxton LJ gave a concurring judgment and Tuckey LJ agreed with both. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:50 am by Kevin
The following excerpts are from R. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 am by INFORRM
  Politicians are expected to “have the thickest skins” – draws attention to cases such Lingens v Austria, Reynolds v Times Newspapers and discussion in the Von Hannover case. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am by Matthew Flinn
This principle was applied to the press in R v Crook (1991) 93 Cr App R (2) 37 in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:37 am
“When compelling public policy requires that the speaker be immune from suit, the law affords an absolute privilege, while statements fostering a lesser public interest are only [qualifiedly] privileged (see Liberman v Gelstein, 80 NY2d 429, 437 [1992]). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm by E. R. Wrigley
Buxton J was also asked to consider whether the claimant could recover damages. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms T argued that Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36 supported this argument. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
See the analysis by Lord Justice Buxton in McKennit v Ash [2008] QB 73. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
His decision was upheld on appeal with both Buxton LJ and Longmore LJ paying tribute to his ‘careful and correct’ judgment and his handling of the case. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm by INFORRM
There have been a number of settlements of libel actions which have resulted in apologies but no statement in open court – for example, Ed Buxton v News Group (the “Sun”) and NOW Magazine,  Eason v Kordowski (Solicitors from Hell), Sawalha v Phillips (libel on Spectator blog), Laker v News Group (body scanner libel), Islam Expo v Spectator, Forzini v Times Newspapers, Gordon Taylor v Associated Newspapers… [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:13 pm by war
As the High Court’s references to Champagne Heidsieck v Buxton (a case, if not exactly dear to my heart, certainly engraved on it!) [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  Permission to appeal was granted by Sir Richard Buxton on 18 August 2010. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am by emagraken
 20 and the regulations, ICBC is notobligated to pay:  see Buxton v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am by INFORRM
Buxton LJ, with whom Latham and Longmore LJJ agreed, stated that:- “The width of the rights given to the media by A v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:00 am by Alisa Lazear
Consider the impact of a period missing after the “v” in a style of cause, compared to defaulting a lawyer in a written scenario as male. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am by war
Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130 Société Anonyme des Manujactures de Glaces v. [read post]