Search for: "Buxton v. Buxton"
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2012, 12:00 pm
As Richard Buxton (pp.393-94) points out, “core entitlements” are something different from the Convention reasons. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
The paper application for permission was considered by retired Lord Justice, Sir Richard Buxton. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
In the Courts On 28 October 2011 Sir Richard Buxton refused the defendant permission to appeal in the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group (see Case Tracker). [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
TDCJ-CID (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)Buxton v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
20 and the regulations, ICBC is notobligated to pay: see Buxton v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
This principle was applied to the press in R v Crook (1991) 93 Cr App R (2) 37 in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm
Permission to appeal was granted by Sir Richard Buxton on 18 August 2010. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
There have been a number of settlements of libel actions which have resulted in apologies but no statement in open court – for example, Ed Buxton v News Group (the “Sun”) and NOW Magazine, Eason v Kordowski (Solicitors from Hell), Sawalha v Phillips (libel on Spectator blog), Laker v News Group (body scanner libel), Islam Expo v Spectator, Forzini v Times Newspapers, Gordon Taylor v Associated Newspapers… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:43 am
Regina v Buxton and others [2010] WLR (D) 214 “There was no reason in principle why a restraining order should not be made to protect a company or a group of persons from harassment. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 am
Politicians are expected to “have the thickest skins” – draws attention to cases such Lingens v Austria, Reynolds v Times Newspapers and discussion in the Von Hannover case. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
It was the Court of Appeal decision in McKennitt v Ash [ 2008] QB 73 , comprising of Buxton LJ, Longmore LJ ( pictured) and Latham LJ, which first set out clearly the false privacy principles namely; The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private not whether it is true or false. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Buxton LJ, with whom Latham and Longmore LJJ agreed, stated that:- “The width of the rights given to the media by A v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
The proposition that such conduct amounts to an abuse of process received the endorsement of the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73, para 79 per Buxton LJ). if it could be shown that a claim in breach of confidence was brought where the nub of the case was a complaint of the falsity of the allegation and that was done to avoid the rules of the tort of defamation, then objection could be raised in terms of abuse of process. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Buxton v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm
Buxton J was also asked to consider whether the claimant could recover damages. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:37 am
“When compelling public policy requires that the speaker be immune from suit, the law affords an absolute privilege, while statements fostering a lesser public interest are only [qualifiedly] privileged (see Liberman v Gelstein, 80 NY2d 429, 437 [1992]). [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:46 am
Richard Buxton (a Firm) v Mills-Owens Court of Appeal “Since solicitors were under a professional duty not to advance arguments which they did not consider to be properly arguable, where a client insisted on such argument being advanced, a solicitor was lawfully entitled to terminate his retainer. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:13 pm
As the High Court’s references to Champagne Heidsieck v Buxton (a case, if not exactly dear to my heart, certainly engraved on it!) [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm
See the analysis by Lord Justice Buxton in McKennit v Ash [2008] QB 73. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
Buxton LJ gave a concurring judgment and Tuckey LJ agreed with both. [read post]
